Skip to content

The Centre for the Study of Corruption

TwitterLinkedin
Governance & Integrity Anti-Corruption Evidence
Governance & Integrity Anti-Corruption Evidence
Governance & Integrity Anti-Corruption Evidence
  • About
  • Our work
    • Research themes
      • Global finance and the enablers of corruption
        • Corruption in Paradise: An ecology of money laundering through real estate in the touristic Global South
        • Identifying Enabler Networks and Their Vulnerabilities
        • Testing and Evidencing Compliance with Beneficial Ownership Checks
        • Gatekeepers, Enablers or Technicians: The Contested Interpretation of Lawyers as Facilitators of Kleptocracy and Grand Corruption
        • Does transparency bring cleanliness? Offshore financial secrecy reform and corruption control
        • Beneficial Ownership – Nigeria
      • Crisis responses and corruption in vunerable sectors
        • Addressing Corruption in the Crisis Response of the Malawian Health System
        • Crisis Emergencies, State Responses and ‘Windows’ of Corruption in Uganda
        • The Corrupting Effect of Political Connections in Public Procurement through Crises
      • Corruption risks in global trade and commerce
        • Lessons for Combating Illicit Cross-Border Trade and Money Laundering from the Congo
        • Interrogating Corruption Risk in the Climate Transition: Trading in Voluntary Carbon Markets
        • International Deal-Making, Beliefs, and Local Social Norms
        • Regulating Cross-Border Trading – East Africa
      • State capture
        • Building Resilience to State Capture
        • Engaging the Public to Fight State Capture
        • Building Institutional Resilience to Global Illicit Financial Flows as Enablers and Drivers of State Capture
      • Sectors and Institutions
        • Effective Law Enforcement – Nigeria & Malawi
        • Social Norms & Behaviors & Health – Tanzania
        • Preventing Medical Theft – Malawi
        • Curbing corruption in procurement
      • Integrity systems
        • Cities of Integrity: Zambia and South Africa
        • Advancing Integrity – Uganda
        • Harnessing Informality – East & Central Africa & Kyrgyzstan
        • Leveraging Social Audits – India
        • Integrity & Civil Servants – Nepal & Bangladesh
    • Fellowship
    • Rethinking Anti-Corruption
    • From Research to Practice
  • Resources
    • Publications
    • Blogs
    • Newsletter
    • Multimedia
    • Digital Library
  • News & events
    • GI ACE in the news
    • Seminars/events
  • Contact
Search
  • About
  • Our work
    • Research themes
      • Global finance and the enablers of corruption
        • Corruption in Paradise: An ecology of money laundering through real estate in the touristic Global South
        • Identifying Enabler Networks and Their Vulnerabilities
        • Testing and Evidencing Compliance with Beneficial Ownership Checks
        • Gatekeepers, Enablers or Technicians: The Contested Interpretation of Lawyers as Facilitators of Kleptocracy and Grand Corruption
        • Does transparency bring cleanliness? Offshore financial secrecy reform and corruption control
        • Beneficial Ownership – Nigeria
      • Crisis responses and corruption in vunerable sectors
        • Addressing Corruption in the Crisis Response of the Malawian Health System
        • Crisis Emergencies, State Responses and ‘Windows’ of Corruption in Uganda
        • The Corrupting Effect of Political Connections in Public Procurement through Crises
      • Corruption risks in global trade and commerce
        • Lessons for Combating Illicit Cross-Border Trade and Money Laundering from the Congo
        • Interrogating Corruption Risk in the Climate Transition: Trading in Voluntary Carbon Markets
        • International Deal-Making, Beliefs, and Local Social Norms
        • Regulating Cross-Border Trading – East Africa
      • State capture
        • Building Resilience to State Capture
        • Engaging the Public to Fight State Capture
        • Building Institutional Resilience to Global Illicit Financial Flows as Enablers and Drivers of State Capture
      • Sectors and Institutions
        • Effective Law Enforcement – Nigeria & Malawi
        • Social Norms & Behaviors & Health – Tanzania
        • Preventing Medical Theft – Malawi
        • Curbing corruption in procurement
      • Integrity systems
        • Cities of Integrity: Zambia and South Africa
        • Advancing Integrity – Uganda
        • Harnessing Informality – East & Central Africa & Kyrgyzstan
        • Leveraging Social Audits – India
        • Integrity & Civil Servants – Nepal & Bangladesh
    • Fellowship
    • Rethinking Anti-Corruption
    • From Research to Practice
  • Resources
    • Publications
    • Blogs
    • Newsletter
    • Multimedia
    • Digital Library
  • News & events
    • GI ACE in the news
    • Seminars/events
  • Contact

Category Archives: International Architecture

tender boxes with red flags

Why is collecting and analysing data about public procurement so damned difficult? Data scientists explain some common problems

David-Barrett, International ArchitectureBy GI ACE17/09/2019Leave a comment

In a new Red Flags Explainer, Liz David-Barrett, Mihaly Fazekas, Agnes Czibik, Bence Toth, and Isabelle Adam draw on their experience of building and analysing datasets of government procurement over the past ten years to answer some Frequently Asked Questions about their work.

citizen science and global anti-corruption written on coins side by side with related words around

From citizen science to global anti-corruption: Two sides of the same coin

Chmura, International ArchitectureBy GI ACE27/08/2019Leave a comment

GI-ACE researcher Thorsten Chmura discussed focus of research on transnational corruption in international business, pushing the boundaries of citizen science.

Does transparency bring cleanliness? Offshore financial secrecy reform and corruption control

Haberly, International ArchitectureBy GI ACE13/08/2019Leave a comment

Researcher Dan Haberly discusses GI-ACE project attempting to understand how years of specific offshore financial secrecy regulatory reform either have, or possibly have not, impacted the use and shape of illicit financial architectures.

procurement notebook on desk with pad of paper and pencil holder - red sticky notes have red flag indicators noted on them throughout the image

Using ‘red flag’ indicators to identify corruption and analyse reform efforts in the procurement process

David-Barrett, International ArchitectureBy GI ACE08/07/20191 Comment

In this GI-ACE project, data is used to develop new proxy indicators of corruption risk, based on ‘red flags’ in the tendering process, and then used to test how patterns of corruption differ across contexts and whether anti-corruption efforts work.

Nigerian currency

Hiding the beneficial owner and the proceeds of corruption

Harvey, Integrity Systems, International ArchitectureBy GI ACE20/06/2019Leave a comment

Researcher Jackie Harvey discusses GI-ACE project nvestigating how the current international anti-corruption frameworks function within Nigeria and how they can be better targeted to reduce opportunities for the proceeds of corruption to be moved across the globe while the beneficial owner remains hidden.

Anti-money lanudering typewritten on paper on desk with spreadsheets glasses pens amount circled in red

How effective are beneficial ownership checks?

Heathershaw, International ArchitectureBy GI ACE05/06/2019Leave a comment

GI-ACE researcher John Heathershaw discusses project investigating laundering of monies and reputations by professional enablers for African and Central Asian elites.

123
Go to Top

GI ACE is funded by the UK’s Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office (FCDO) and UK International Development. The views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the UK Government’s official policies.

About

  • About
  • Our Team
  • Contact Us

Our Work

  • Research themes
  • Events

Resources

  • Blogs
  • Publications

Connect with us

If you've used any of GI ACE's research to inform policy and/or practice, let us know by sending an email at gi-ace@sussex.ac.uk. © 2025 GI ACE. All rights reserved. Hosted by the Centre for the Study of Corruption at the University of Sussex