Using the Red Flags tool to curb corruption in procurement
The Red Flags method uses large datasets to develop practical tools to hold governments and funders to account, but improving accountability and reducing corruption depends on users having the skills and tools to interpret data and use our method. Building on Phase 1 findings, this project utilises the red-flags methodology to build online analytics portals and train a range of stakeholders to use them to identify malfeasance in procurement.
To learn more about this project, contact Principal Investigator Liz David-Barrett.
Project Summary
The aim of this project is to strengthen capacity to use the red-flags methodology to identify malfeasance in procurement, by developing a user-friendly online analysis tool and training a wide group of users to ensure take-up. The overall aim is to reduce the prevalence of corruption in this important area of public spending.
The intended goal of this pilot is that these users integrate the tool into their work, using it to identify risk patterns and investigate further. Depending on what an investigation finds, this could subsequently lead to a number of intermediary outcomes such as changing procurement rules and IT systems (e.g. better data capture), increasing monitoring of particular procuring entities, disciplinary action against public officials, or debarment of certain suppliers.
The project worked closely with the Integrity Commission of Jamaica, the Ugandan Public Procurement and Disposal of Assets Authority, and Africa Freedom of Information Centre to develop the Opentender Uganda and Opentender Jamaica tools.
Policy and Programming Implications
Corruption in public procurement is difficult to spot or measure because manipulation is often hidden and it is hard to distinguish corruption from inefficiency or incompetence.
We develop procurement data analytics portals to help stakeholders – including procurement regulators, law enforcement, and civil society organisations – monitor their country’s procurement and identify high-risk or suspicious patterns. These can be used to stimulate investigations, improve accountability, or to inform changes in policy aimed at closing down loopholes or disincentivising corrupt practices.
Research Questions
- How can big data analytics help us identify corruption risks in public procurement?
- How can procurement regulators better detect and fight corruption?
Methodology
We build our procurement data analytics portals after wide consultation with stakeholders and in close collaboration with our local partners, to ensure that they are as useful as possible for practitioners. We use data that our partners already collect, but clean and process it so that we can use it to build corruption risk indicators that make sense in the local context.
We are also producing training videos to make it easier for practitioners to use the tool, even beyond the life of this project. Our aim is that local stakeholders integrate procurement data analysis into their routine work.
Publications

Controlling Corruption in Development Aid: New Evidence from Contract-Level Data
Following scandals about corruption in foreign aid, and in a political climate that increasingly questions the legitimacy of development assistance, donors are under pressure to better control how their funds are spent. However, there is little evidence on precisely how…

Government Contracting dataset
Update on datasets collected on development projects, public tenders, and contracts for three major donor agencies: the World Bank, the Inter-American Development Bank (IADB), and EuropeAid. The datasets not only republish structured data gathered from official source websites, but also…

Working Paper: Anti-corruption interventions
The project analysed a dataset of World Bank-funded development aid tenders over two decades in >100 developing countries. With data points from multiple stages of the procurement process and key outcomes, the project observe the heterogeneous effects of a 2003…
Related Media
Related Blogs
Research Team Members

Liz David-Barrett
Professor, University of Sussex; Director of the Centre for the Study of Corruption

Mihály Fazekas
Assistant Professor, Central European University; Scientific Director, Government Transparency Institute